Porting to the Sanguino (ATMega644p)

Over the weekend, I duplicated the 'Satpack' breadboard, this time using an ATMega644p micro-controller, which offers twice the programming space, EEPROM and, perhaps most important for debugging radio-control software, two hardware serial ports.
Bootloading this with my USBTinyISP  was a complete snap, in part because this chip puts all the SPI pins beside each other. I used the Arduino environment to bootload, following the instructions at http://sanguino.cc



The only snag I ran into, besides the usual wrong pin counts, etc., was that the reset pin, connected to the serial DTR via a 0.1 microfarad capacitor, really does need a pull-up resistor, despite the presence of an internal one. Without it, I had unreliable uploads.

On the whole, it was amazingly easy to port code: just recompile (which the Arduino IDE does automatically), and load. One quirky difference between this chip and the ATMega328 was the speed with which it did EEPROM writes. Developing on the ATMega328, my code to store satellite elements in EEPROM basically just threw the data in as fast as it could. This resulted in bad communication on the '644p, so I introduced a delay variable. This needed to be as high as 50ms per character to get reliable writing. Over 2kB of data, that's a pretty bad delay. Unless I can somehow get rid of this, it will be a strong argument for just using the DS32C35 as a RTC and memory chip.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Operating a Transmitter from the Roaring 20s

Image
Radio was booming in the 1920s: transmitters had started using the pure tone of 'continuous wave' signals, replacing signals sent with sparks, and increasingly selective and sensitive receiver circuits offered greater range seemingly by the month. Amateurs, not yet able to tame their simple transmitters with crystal-controlled oscillators, constructed them on simple wooden boards with heavy wiring and large inductor coils in order to keep heating from causing their signals to drift. These homebrew transmitters were ongoing experiments in electronics and engineering. The position of a coil might increase output power but cause the signal to sound like a buzzsaw. If you could find a higher voltage power supply, that too would raise its power, but the increased currents in the rig would add more drift: if the other guy can't find your signal wandering up and down the band, what use is that extra 3 watts? The 1929 QSO Party Every year the Antique Wireless Association holds a tw
Read more

Defining a 49:1 EFHW Transformer's Losses

Image
 End-fed halfwave antennas are so convenient, especially in rapidly deployed setups, and they're easy to build . But how much energy is lost in the 49:1 transformer that makes it possible? Because I operate mainly QRP, and I'm using a rather large core for 5w, I'm not concerned with losses that appear once the transformer's core reaches the Curie temperature. So I can use a nanoVNA, performing a S21 logmag trace on two cores back-to-back, to see how much power my transformer is eating up on the way to the antenna. I used the Fair-Rite 2643625002 core, inspired by excellent results MM0OPX reports in a generously shared spreadsheet of results. Could I get around 0.5 dB loss from 80m all the way to 10m if I used that core in 21:3 turns ratio?  My experience with more donut-shaped ones suggested that such broad-banded performance was a tough order: a 14:2 turns ratio works well on one end of the HF band; 21:3 works well on the other. In the end, Colin's accompanying vi
Read more