Satpack PCB version 1.0

PCBs for the satpack project arrived from BatchPCB.com about three weeks ago. These are designed to mate with the appropriate pins on a Arduino Mini Pro, and to provide that Arduino with access to the realtime clock, piezoelectric speaker, buttons and  mini-din 8 connector required to control a recent Yaesu radio. To the right is one side of the design, the critical side that mates onto the Arduino. The boards are made from this design, but it ought not to be used, due to the errors described below.



First, I have to say I was quite pleased with BatchPCB. Their website keeps you informed of the progress of your project, which in my case took about 25 days from order to arrival at my mailbox. If you can keep your project small, as this one is, it will be very affordable. My happiest surprise with BatchPCB was that the shipping charges -- indicated, as usual right at the end of the check-out process -- were very reasonable, especially for a destination outside the USA. I'm really tired of companies overcharging shipping, and I think it eventually lowers the impression of the business. Second, others have said that they tend to send you twice as many boards as you ordered, and that was my experience. I ordered three and received six. As far as I can tell, all are properly manufactured.

Moreover, the design of this board was not an easy one. The Mini Pro puts the I2C SLA and SDA lines on those two connectors that are inset from the main row of them at the bottom middle of the photo above. They're also offset horizontally an odd distance. Nevertheless, the connectors mated perfectly.

This being my first pcb design, it was not without flaws. The picture to the right, of the top of the pcb, shows one of them quite clearly. The three square pads in the middle right of the board are to be soldered to the coin battery holder for the realtime clock. the dots beside the middle pad are 'vias', means of sending a signal from this side of the board to the bottom. However, if I put the coin cell in that space, its bottom would connect to these vias, putting the battery's voltage on those signals: not good. Eagle, the PCB design software I have, has a way of making a region no-go for vias, and I've fixed that in the second revision of the board. Fortunately, I bought some batteries with connected leads and soldered one of those to the pads.

My second error was harder to fix: I had accidentally swapped the SDA and SCL lines between the Arduino and the DS3232 realtime clock. I had to carefully dremel out the old lines and do a 'green wire' fix. Of course, I attempted to do this past midnight using wire that was about 10 gauges too thick! (Recommendation to new pcb designers: buy yourself some really fine insulated wire in preparation for the arrival of your first design. I wrote BatchPCB and told them I thought it would be classy to put a foot or so of the stuff in the box for new customers!)

Against all odds, it worked. The serial and power lines from the radio were all in the right place, and the result is a small dongle that doppler tunes my FT-817 very nicely indeed.

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 5, 2011 at 4:27 AM

    Have you laid out a revised satpack PCB? I would really like to use this with my FT-817

    ReplyDelete
  2. PCB AssemblyNovember 14, 2011 at 10:28 AM

    Thanks for also share this pcb design layout.

    ReplyDelete
  3. wordNerdFebruary 19, 2012 at 8:06 PM

    I just bought my first Arduino with the idea of building one of these based on your design. Do you have an updated design?

    Do you have a diagram explaining how the CAT cable pins connect to the Arduino?

    Thank you.
    K7TRY

    ReplyDelete
  4. pcb assemblyMay 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM

    I heard BatchPCB is run by Spark Fun Electronics. Is it true ?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Operating a Transmitter from the Roaring 20s

Image
Radio was booming in the 1920s: transmitters had started using the pure tone of 'continuous wave' signals, replacing signals sent with sparks, and increasingly selective and sensitive receiver circuits offered greater range seemingly by the month. Amateurs, not yet able to tame their simple transmitters with crystal-controlled oscillators, constructed them on simple wooden boards with heavy wiring and large inductor coils in order to keep heating from causing their signals to drift. These homebrew transmitters were ongoing experiments in electronics and engineering. The position of a coil might increase output power but cause the signal to sound like a buzzsaw. If you could find a higher voltage power supply, that too would raise its power, but the increased currents in the rig would add more drift: if the other guy can't find your signal wandering up and down the band, what use is that extra 3 watts? The 1929 QSO Party Every year the Antique Wireless Association holds a tw
Read more

Defining a 49:1 EFHW Transformer's Losses

Image
 End-fed halfwave antennas are so convenient, especially in rapidly deployed setups, and they're easy to build . But how much energy is lost in the 49:1 transformer that makes it possible? Because I operate mainly QRP, and I'm using a rather large core for 5w, I'm not concerned with losses that appear once the transformer's core reaches the Curie temperature. So I can use a nanoVNA, performing a S21 logmag trace on two cores back-to-back, to see how much power my transformer is eating up on the way to the antenna. I used the Fair-Rite 2643625002 core, inspired by excellent results MM0OPX reports in a generously shared spreadsheet of results. Could I get around 0.5 dB loss from 80m all the way to 10m if I used that core in 21:3 turns ratio?  My experience with more donut-shaped ones suggested that such broad-banded performance was a tough order: a 14:2 turns ratio works well on one end of the HF band; 21:3 works well on the other. In the end, Colin's accompanying vi
Read more