Check those cables

The performance of my 435 MHz AA2RX lindenblad has not been quite as good as the simple vertical that it replaced, leading me to take the assembly down and debug it. I don't have an antenna analyzer, so I relied on a good ole' 70cm SWR and power meter with a two-carbon-resistor 5w dummy load.

My suspicion rested on the 4m cable running from the antenna to the preamp. Sure enough. To test it, I set the TS-2000 to 5w output, put a 1.5m patch cord of LMR-240 with N-connectors between the radio and the meter, and terminated the meter with the dummy load. Sure enough, the measured power was just shy of 5w, maybe about 4.8w. A longer run of LMR-400 gave the same result; however, the cable that had been out of doors gave me only 3w of power, meaning that 2 of the 5w in were gobbled up in the cable. This is about a 2dB loss, and absolute murder for an omni antenna setup because we have no gain from the antenna pattern. Moreover, all losses before the preamp go straight into the noise figure. No wonder the vertical was winning out.

Trying other cables around the shack led to other alarming facts. I had a similar run of LMR-400-like cable that was producing something like 8 dB loss! I'd love to know why these failed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Operating a Transmitter from the Roaring 20s

Image
Radio was booming in the 1920s: transmitters had started using the pure tone of 'continuous wave' signals, replacing signals sent with sparks, and increasingly selective and sensitive receiver circuits offered greater range seemingly by the month. Amateurs, not yet able to tame their simple transmitters with crystal-controlled oscillators, constructed them on simple wooden boards with heavy wiring and large inductor coils in order to keep heating from causing their signals to drift. These homebrew transmitters were ongoing experiments in electronics and engineering. The position of a coil might increase output power but cause the signal to sound like a buzzsaw. If you could find a higher voltage power supply, that too would raise its power, but the increased currents in the rig would add more drift: if the other guy can't find your signal wandering up and down the band, what use is that extra 3 watts? The 1929 QSO Party Every year the Antique Wireless Association holds a tw
Read more

Defining a 49:1 EFHW Transformer's Losses

Image
 End-fed halfwave antennas are so convenient, especially in rapidly deployed setups, and they're easy to build . But how much energy is lost in the 49:1 transformer that makes it possible? Because I operate mainly QRP, and I'm using a rather large core for 5w, I'm not concerned with losses that appear once the transformer's core reaches the Curie temperature. So I can use a nanoVNA, performing a S21 logmag trace on two cores back-to-back, to see how much power my transformer is eating up on the way to the antenna. I used the Fair-Rite 2643625002 core, inspired by excellent results MM0OPX reports in a generously shared spreadsheet of results. Could I get around 0.5 dB loss from 80m all the way to 10m if I used that core in 21:3 turns ratio?  My experience with more donut-shaped ones suggested that such broad-banded performance was a tough order: a 14:2 turns ratio works well on one end of the HF band; 21:3 works well on the other. In the end, Colin's accompanying vi
Read more