Building the AA2TX Parasitic (Or 'Passive') Lindenblad for 70cm

The AA2TX parasitic lindenblad, which was published in Feb 2010 QST (and has been available online for some time), is proving to be an enjoyable project. I have modified some components because I could not find them here in Atlantic Canada. The #8 aluminum wire for the passive elements is not in our big box stores (different wiring regulations?), and the PVC ferrules require a special order, at least at this point in the year, when no sane person would be installing eavestroughing. So I made do with what I had, and the results are encouraging.

I used 1/2" wood dowling for the horizontal members and #12 copper wire for the parasitic elements. I used exactly the same measurements as in the published project. I'm sealing the wood to ensure that it survives the weather, and I fixed the elements in their holes in the wood using a glue gun.

I'm getting about a 1.5 SWR at 435-436 MHz, which I consider acceptable. Moreover, the SWR drops as I tune higher. I believe this is a good situation, since ice and rain tends to drop the resonant fequency of an antenna.

One tip for anyone who is testing this as they build. Before you take any SWR measurements, make asbolutely sure that the feedline is tightly affixed to the vertical element and has its ferrites properly placed. With the feedline hanging loosely and about 1/2" away from the vertical element, I got very different results. Moreover, in my experience, the vertical element without the 'hub' will produce an extremely low SWR over a large part of 70cm. If you aren't getting that, don't fiddle with the hub; look into if your cable is correctly attached to the elements and if the coax is properly choked at the bottom of the lower element.

I will finish this version by using the Marine Goop recommended by Tony to seal and glue. I expect the doweling will survive nicely, even when affixed to the PVC hub with hot glue or epoxy: there just isn't much force on them.

Comments

  1. Malcolm VE2DDZJune 24, 2010 at 10:45 AM

    Hi Bruce, A friend and I also built this antenna and observed the same thing you did: the distance between the coax feed and the lower dipole element dramatically affects the SWR. In our case we substituted for the LMR-240 called for in the design. When we swept the antenna we found a nice SWR about 420 MHz, but not at 436 (this with the coax tight against the dipole as instructed). We were just getting ready to trim the dipole when my build partner (George VE2NGH) noticed that after releasing the cable ties holding the coax against the dipole we were getting the SWR we wanted at the desired frequency! So for us with different coax the answer was no trimming and space between the dipole and the coax.

    The moral seems to be use LMR-240 tight against the dipole if at all possible. If you must substitute the coax, you may have to adjust the spacing between the dipole and coax to get the resonance you want.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bruce Robertson VE9QRJuly 26, 2010 at 2:35 PM

    Malcom et al. --

    A bit of an update. I have upgraded to LMR240 for the feedline, and am feeding that directly to a weather-proofed filter and preamp combo. The SWR is even better, and I'm finding this an excellent omnidirectional antenna.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousAugust 4, 2010 at 2:30 AM

    Did anyone consider modifying the central centre-fed dipole to an end-fed.. like a J-pole? Then you can get rid of the lossy ferrite, have no more de-tuning effects from the co-ax and have a handy pole to drill and mount the circular converter?
    Hugh G6AIG

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 26, 2011 at 2:15 AM

    Hi,

    Wood is used to survive the weather and copper is best for the wire of LMR 240. We can use aluminium wire for it. Thanks a lot..

    LMR 400

    ReplyDelete
  5. gogssApril 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM

    Hi Bruce,
    pls tell me what are the current trends of Parasitic Lindenblad antenna?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Edgardo MaffíaOctober 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM

    You can feed the dipole THRU the lower leg. Is a very common system called "Coaxial Antenna". The ferrite bead will be in the same place.
    Regards.
    Edgardo Maffia LU1AR
    Buenos Aires - Argentina

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Operating a Transmitter from the Roaring 20s

Image
Radio was booming in the 1920s: transmitters had started using the pure tone of 'continuous wave' signals, replacing signals sent with sparks, and increasingly selective and sensitive receiver circuits offered greater range seemingly by the month. Amateurs, not yet able to tame their simple transmitters with crystal-controlled oscillators, constructed them on simple wooden boards with heavy wiring and large inductor coils in order to keep heating from causing their signals to drift. These homebrew transmitters were ongoing experiments in electronics and engineering. The position of a coil might increase output power but cause the signal to sound like a buzzsaw. If you could find a higher voltage power supply, that too would raise its power, but the increased currents in the rig would add more drift: if the other guy can't find your signal wandering up and down the band, what use is that extra 3 watts? The 1929 QSO Party Every year the Antique Wireless Association holds a tw
Read more

'Satpack' Arduino tracker PCB

Image
Lots of progress with 'satpack', my Arduino-based full-doppler-tuning satellite tracking application. On the right, you see a cardboard mockup of the pcb. On the software side, I've checked a fully working version of the code into the SVN repository.
Read more