Progress in 160m


This 50' aluminum vertical with auto-tuner at its base has served me reasonably well in QRP contesting, even on bands like 15m where its pattern should be poor DX. However, while it tunes nicely from 10-80m, 160m has eluded me. Two years ago, I rigged a wire up to the top of it and make a sort of parallel inverted L, but the Winter winds soon make short shrift of this. The snow and ice loads down the wire, and that, being horizontal, pulls down the entire vertical.

This time around I settled for base loading. Not having an antenna analyzer, I used the demo mode of EZNec to guess the capacitive impedance of the vertical. Finding an unused water bottle to use as a former, I wound about 20 turns of about #14 enamel wire over its 3.5" diameter.


I didn't bother with a transformer tap, hoping that the SMC autotuner would deal with the rest of the matching. While initially I did get a good match, I was disappointed to see that this did not prevail across the band. The tuning was very touchy, indeed.

However, when I got transmitting during the contest, the coil had obviously made a difference. Running QRP, I could work anyone with a S9 or greater signal, and even snagged my first DX on this band, a QSO with Turks and Caicos.

Obviously, what's happened is that I've improved the SWR on the feedline (RG-8) from an absolutely rediculous value to something terrible, but not so terrible that the RF is lost in the feedline. Since feedline losses are comparatively low on 160m, I still get some RF into the antenna.


I have three improvements in mind. First, for contesting, it would be great to be able to switch this coil in and out of the circuit remotely. A micro-controller with RF link or XBee would do just fine. Secondly, a more perfect match would improve things more. But I think realistically I'd need an antenna analyzer to do this well. Perhaps the greatest improvement in performance might be gained by replacing the feedline with LMR-400. This would better my signal on all bands, after all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Operating a Transmitter from the Roaring 20s

Image
Radio was booming in the 1920s: transmitters had started using the pure tone of 'continuous wave' signals, replacing signals sent with sparks, and increasingly selective and sensitive receiver circuits offered greater range seemingly by the month. Amateurs, not yet able to tame their simple transmitters with crystal-controlled oscillators, constructed them on simple wooden boards with heavy wiring and large inductor coils in order to keep heating from causing their signals to drift. These homebrew transmitters were ongoing experiments in electronics and engineering. The position of a coil might increase output power but cause the signal to sound like a buzzsaw. If you could find a higher voltage power supply, that too would raise its power, but the increased currents in the rig would add more drift: if the other guy can't find your signal wandering up and down the band, what use is that extra 3 watts? The 1929 QSO Party Every year the Antique Wireless Association holds a tw
Read more

Defining a 49:1 EFHW Transformer's Losses

Image
 End-fed halfwave antennas are so convenient, especially in rapidly deployed setups, and they're easy to build . But how much energy is lost in the 49:1 transformer that makes it possible? Because I operate mainly QRP, and I'm using a rather large core for 5w, I'm not concerned with losses that appear once the transformer's core reaches the Curie temperature. So I can use a nanoVNA, performing a S21 logmag trace on two cores back-to-back, to see how much power my transformer is eating up on the way to the antenna. I used the Fair-Rite 2643625002 core, inspired by excellent results MM0OPX reports in a generously shared spreadsheet of results. Could I get around 0.5 dB loss from 80m all the way to 10m if I used that core in 21:3 turns ratio?  My experience with more donut-shaped ones suggested that such broad-banded performance was a tough order: a 14:2 turns ratio works well on one end of the HF band; 21:3 works well on the other. In the end, Colin's accompanying vi
Read more